On Nov 14, 3:26 am, kj <no.em...@please.post> wrote: > One more thing: I found Rob Pike's mutterings on generics (towards > the end of his rollout video) rather offputting, because he gave > the impression that some important aspects of the language were > not even considered before major decisions for it were set in stone. > It looks like, if they ever get around to supporting generics, it > will be a late-in-the-day hack. >
By "set in stone," do you mean "implemented"? Or have Rob Pike and friends literally put a redesign freeze on the language that was just released this month? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
