On Nov 14, 7:18 pm, John Nagle <na...@animats.com> wrote: > Leaving out exceptions was a mistake. Exceptions are well understood > now, > and they're far better than the usual "ignore errors" approach one sees in > lamer > C programs.
I am also surprised about the lack of exceptions. I could infer that Rob Pike and Ken Thompson are idiots that lack experience with languages with exceptions, or I could infer that they have reasons for doing so. I do not know about exceptions enough to have an opinion myself. However I will notice that in Python, when using threads, exceptions do not work so well: if I forget to trap an exception in a thread I see a traceback on stderr, but the other threads continue to run, basically ignoring the exception. Probably the language that get things right is Erlang, which is supervising all crashed process and it is designed to safely recover for unexpected events. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
