On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:21 PM, David Stanek <dsta...@dstanek.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:43 PM, namekuseijin <namekusei...@gmail.com> wrote: >> someone said: >>>>>> >>>>>> If you took a look at Java, you would >>>>>> notice that the core language syntax is much simpler than Python's. >> >> thanks for the laughs whoever you are! >> > > I'm no Java fan, but I do agree that the core language is a bit easier > for people to grasp. I have also heard that from other developers as > well.
Really? Core language, eh? Just take a look at just the summary of the Java language spec: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/j3TOC.html Then compare with the summary for Python 3.0 language reference: http://docs.python.org/3.0/reference/ Like comparing a mammoth to a zebra. Besides, how is: for( int i=0; i<10; i++ ) simpler than: for i in (range(10)) ? Scripting languages like Python eventually led Java to provide a more friendly for, which they call, quite appropriately, enhacedFor. Here's it in action: for (Map.Entry<String, Integer> e : histogram.entrySet()) in Python: for e in histogram.items() fun. Here's a more complete example, available a bit down from: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/statements.html#14.14.2 Map<String, Integer> histogram = ...; double total = 0; for (int i : histogram.values()) total += i; for (Map.Entry<String, Integer> e : histogram.entrySet()) System.out.println(e.getKey() + " " + e.getValue() / total); in Python: histogram = ... total=0 for i in histogram.values(): total+=i for e in histogram.items(): print( e[0] + " " + str( e[1]/float(total) )) yeah, surely a friggin' lot more complex... and we didn't even come to use any of Java's HUUUGE APIs, just the core lang... BTW, I'm amused that Java's string concatanating doesn't require an explicit cast from the float result. anyway, again, thanks for the laughs. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
