Opened a ticket for this and attached a patch. (experimental) http://bugs.python.org/issue5736
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:39 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >>>> I assumed there were some decisions behind this, rather than it's just >>>> not implemented yet. >>> I believe this assumption is wrong - it's really that no code has been >>> contributed to do that. >> >> But doesn't the issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue662923 imply that >> there *was* suitable code (for 2.4)? > > Yes, for bsddb. > >> So is this a regression? > > No. bsddb still supports iteration in 2.6. > >> And should that issue be re-opened? > > I don't think that would matter much. Actually contributing code might. > > Regards, > Martin > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
