>>> I assumed there were some decisions behind this, rather than it's just >>> not implemented yet. >> I believe this assumption is wrong - it's really that no code has been >> contributed to do that. > > But doesn't the issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue662923 imply that > there *was* suitable code (for 2.4)?
Yes, for bsddb. > So is this a regression? No. bsddb still supports iteration in 2.6. > And should that issue be re-opened? I don't think that would matter much. Actually contributing code might. Regards, Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
