"Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >> I assumed there were some decisions behind this, rather than it's just >> not implemented yet. > > I believe this assumption is wrong - it's really that no code has been > contributed to do that.
But doesn't the issue at http://bugs.python.org/issue662923 imply that there *was* suitable code (for 2.4)? So is this a regression? And should that issue be re-opened? Andrew > For gdbm, you can also use the firstkey/nextkey methods. > > Regards, > Martin > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
