On Jun 3, 9:41 am, "Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's what I think Python should have. I think it should have a > keyword, something like "priv," to identify data or functions as > "private."
As I stated earlier in this thread, if you want a public interface and a private implementation, rather than adding another language feature why not just separate them into two classes? This is exactly what the Bridge pattern provides and would clearly denote your intention in the code. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
