"Russ P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also realize, by the way, that Python allows a client of a class to > define a new class member from completely outside the class > definition. Obviously, that cannot be declared private.
This is bogus about 95% of the time though. For the cases where it is really desired, I think it's best to require the target class to be enable it specifically somehow, maybe by inheriting from a special superclass. That could let the compiler statically resolve member lookups the rest of the time. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
