On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 13:25 -0400, J. Cliff Dyer wrote: > On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Marcel Eichler wrote: > > Am Donnerstag 08 Mai 2008 13:02:52 schrieb J. Clifford Dyer: > > > > > > I didn't said that interfaces are a kind of duck-typing. In fact it > > > > was the exact opposite. > > > > > > > > > Sometimes you need that kind of rigor, and you can get it as > > > > > easily as > > > > > > > > And sometimes you need more. So what? > > > > > > More rigor than Zope's interfaces offer? > > > > Did i say that? I only explained why interfaces are not 'simple method > > stubs'. > > > > Um. Yes. I said "sometimes you need that kind of rigor," and proceeded > to explain how zope interfaces offer it. (which you snipped from your > quotation), and you said "sometimes you need more." If you were > actually responding to what I said, then "sometimes you need more" must > mean more than zope interfaces. > > > > That's new information to > > > me. Perhaps you should stop being argumentative for a moment, and > > > explain exactly what it is you're looking for and why Zope interfaces > > > don't fit the bill. > > > > Perhaps you should read more accurate. It's not my thread and i'm not > > looking for anything here. > > > > Then what were you trying to say? > -- Oook, J. Cliff Dyer Carolina Digital Library and Archives UNC Chapel Hill
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
