On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 09:12 +0200, Daniel Marcel Eichler wrote: > Am Mittwoch 07 Mai 2008 21:48:56 schrieben Sie: > > > > That's the point. Interfaces garantee that a duck is a duck, an not > > > only a chicken that quack. > > Which, in spite of your rhetorical flourish, is the exact opposite of > > duck typing. Duck typing means that if you're looking for quacking > > behavior, and you find a quacking chicken, it's close enough. > > I didn't said that interfaces are a kind of duck-typing. In fact it was > the exact opposite. > > > Sometimes you need that kind of rigor, and you can get it as easily > > as > > And sometimes you need more. So what? >
More rigor than Zope's interfaces offer? That's new information to me. Perhaps you should stop being argumentative for a moment, and explain exactly what it is you're looking for and why Zope interfaces don't fit the bill. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
