On Feb 19, 5:17 am, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Diez B. Roggisch a écrit :> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > >> I'm a little dissatisfied, and just thinking aloud. > > (snip remaining of mostly inarticulate post, just couldn't make sens of > it - as usual) > > > No idea what's wrong with these people here - but I bet if you team up > > with Illias, you can start working on his language-to-rule-them-all in > > no time, shortening the delivery goal of 2011 immensly. > > Hum... Perhaps a bit harsh, but there's something here : castironpi's > posts definitively have something in common with Illias' ones. Couldn't > name exactly what, but still... > > <op> > If you really hope to get any serious attention, stop whining and learn > to express yourself clearly. This won't necessarily make anybody agree > with your proposals, but at least chances are someone will read them. > </op>
Ok, take this one. C is faster than Python. It would be useful, in certain cases, to write C. It is possible but inconvenient, out of the way. Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 11:48:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: C function in a Python context http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_frm/thread/cd2f79dd12e81912/ A simple compile and link function. Useful for basic cases; if you want to get fancy, don't use it. My suspicion is that my choices of message subjects, function names, and variable names, is the biggest hang up. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
