On Feb 19, 7:52 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > En Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:19:29 -0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > > > But 'ext' is actually good. > > Even if it were, that alone doesn't mean it should be included in the > stdlib. > > Start writting a recipe in the Python Cookbook: > http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/ > Upload the module to the Python Package Index:http://pypi.python.org/pypi > Post a notice in the announcement list. > Wait for user feedback. Listen. Improve it. Make it so good that everyone > would love to have it always available. Commit yourself to maintain the > module forever. Suggest inclusion in the stdlib. > > -- > Gabriel Genellina
I don't know what "everyone" "would love" to have "always available". I'm baffled that anyone ever pretends to (know). "No, but nobody likes it." "What?" If cl-py is not the right place for personal exchanges, then get going. I am seeking a rational, informed, constructive evaluation of the merits and demerits of 'ext'. It's also productive to characterize trends of things in the std. lib., and I could even see that discussion arising from this one. It's just up to us whether it's in the same thread or not. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
