[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > I'm a little dissatisfied, and just thinking aloud. > > Some of the ideas that have been proposed on Python-ideas as well as > Python, have received partial evaluation from the alphas. > > Lesser individuals than they could not have invented Python, and would > be liable to ban me merely for this post. Notwithstanding. > > The reason they have cited is, "It is not in prevalent use." > > The printing press, rail, automobiles, and Python, were not in > prevalent use before their invention. I.e., they -can't- come if one > doesn't build it. However, there were writing, transportation, and > programming before these respectively; does it merely suffice to > answer, "Yes it is?" > > The Python gurus' combined professional judgement results in Python. > > Looking through http://www.python.org/dev/peps/ , their own proposals > don't meet their own criteria. Start there. > > It is neither necessary nor sufficient that an expansion is or would > be used.
I don't get it as well - in all other open-source-communities I've been participating, the anonymous wacko shelling out half-baked, incomprehensible ideas faster than a gatling gun *immediately* had the full attention of the big-wigs, and after a short time became project lead. No idea what's wrong with these people here - but I bet if you team up with Illias, you can start working on his language-to-rule-them-all in no time, shortening the delivery goal of 2011 immensly. Looking-forward-to-it-ly yours, Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
