On Feb 5, 6:11 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Multi-threaded control flow is a worthwhile priority. > > It is? That's totally new to me. Given the fact that threads don't scale > I highly doubt your claim, too.
I would propose "for X IN A" for parallel and remain "for X in A" for sequential. BTW for fortress lang I had proposed "for X <- A" and "for X <= A" for sequential/parallel instead of current "for X <- seq(A)", "for X <- A", mb they will implement my way instead. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
