[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Feb 5, 12:26 am, Gabriel Genellina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 5 feb, 03:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >>> Some timing stats: On Windows XP, Python 3.0a2. (...) >>> Are threads an OS bottleneck? >> I don't understand your threading issues, but I would not use 3.0a2 >> for benchmarking anything (except benchmarking Python 3.0 itself). >> AFAIK the developers are first trying to get it right and stable; >> speed issues will be addressed later. >> >> -- >> Gabriel Genellina > > Multi-threaded control flow is a worthwhile priority.
What he said is that you should apply the idea to the mixing of your thread of benchmarking with the thread of python development. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
