On Mon, 7 May 2007 10:55:55 -0400, James Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >says... >> On Sat, 05 May 2007 07:54:50 +0100, Eeyore >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >quasi wrote: >> > >> >> Gib Bogle wrote: >> >> >> >> >Ah, so the firefighters were in on the conspiracy! >> >> >> >> No, but the firefighters are very much aware that there is more to >> >> 9/11 than has been officially revealed. >> >> >> >> This is even more true at Pentagon. The firefighters there brought >> >> dogs trained to search for survivors and/or remains >> > >> >Sounds like good practice. >> > >> > >> >> and found nothing. >> > >> >And the significance of this is ? >> >> The plane was supposed to have passengers. >> >> quasi >> >Yep, and they found them all, therefore, there were none for the dogs to >find. You pretty much made that up. They found nothing -- no bodies, no body parts, no blood, no bones, no luggage, no rings (do gold rings melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no jewelry (do diamonds melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no plane seats, no silverware (ok, maybe they only had plastic). In other words, an immediate mystery to the firefighters was the lack of any indication that the plane had passengers. Even if you believe that most of the passengers were essentially incinerated, it's not believable that all of them were. Some of the bodies should have been recoverable right at the scene. Weeks later, parts of the wreckage were supposedly "analyzed" at a government lab, and the official report claims they were able to isolate DNA for many of the passengers. It doesn't ring true. quasi -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
