quasi wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2007 17:00:01 -0400, krw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] says... >> >>>On Mon, 7 May 2007 10:55:55 -0400, James Beck >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>says... >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 05 May 2007 07:54:50 +0100, Eeyore >>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>quasi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>Gib Bogle wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Ah, so the firefighters were in on the conspiracy! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>No, but the firefighters are very much aware that there is more to >>>>>>>9/11 than has been officially revealed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>This is even more true at Pentagon. The firefighters there brought >>>>>>>dogs trained to search for survivors and/or remains >>>>>> >>>>>>Sounds like good practice. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>and found nothing. >>>>>> >>>>>>And the significance of this is ? >>>>> >>>>>The plane was supposed to have passengers. >>>>> >>>>>quasi >>>>> >>>> >>>>Yep, and they found them all, therefore, there were none for the dogs to >>>>find. >>> >>>You pretty much made that up. >>> >>>They found nothing -- no bodies, no body parts, no blood, no bones, no >>>luggage, no rings (do gold rings melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no >>>jewelry (do diamonds melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no plane seats, >>>no silverware (ok, maybe they only had plastic). In other words, an >>>immediate mystery to the firefighters was the lack of any indication >>>that the plane had passengers. Even if you believe that most of the >>>passengers were essentially incinerated, it's not believable that all >>>of them were. Some of the bodies should have been recoverable right at >>>the scene. >> >>If none of the passenger's remains were ever found, why all the fuss >>last year when they found more. > > > That's news to me. We're talking about the Pentagon, not the WTC. > Besides, I didn't say that no remains were ever found. What I said was > that no passenger remains were found at the Pentagon on 9/11 by the > firefighters or their trained rescue dogs. > > At the WTC, no passenger remains were ever found, as far as I know. Of > course, that's not so surprising. What is surprising is the all too > convenient find of Mohammed Atta's undamaged passport in the WTC > rubble. It wasn't even buried. It was just sitting there, waiting to > be found. > > >>IOW, you're a liar. > > > That's way too strong. > > I'm not saying anything I know to be false. > > >>>Weeks later, parts of the wreckage were supposedly "analyzed" at a >>>government lab, and the official report claims they were able to >>>isolate DNA for many of the passengers. It doesn't ring true. >> >>...and a fool. > > > See if you can keep your argument from degenerating to the level of > personal attacks. > > quasi
That is impossible for most people because this is an issue of religion for them. But then again, attacks are part of religion aren't they? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
