In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > On Mon, 7 May 2007 10:55:55 -0400, James Beck > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >says... > >> On Sat, 05 May 2007 07:54:50 +0100, Eeyore > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >quasi wrote: > >> > > >> >> Gib Bogle wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >Ah, so the firefighters were in on the conspiracy! > >> >> > >> >> No, but the firefighters are very much aware that there is more to > >> >> 9/11 than has been officially revealed. > >> >> > >> >> This is even more true at Pentagon. The firefighters there brought > >> >> dogs trained to search for survivors and/or remains > >> > > >> >Sounds like good practice. > >> > > >> > > >> >> and found nothing. > >> > > >> >And the significance of this is ? > >> > >> The plane was supposed to have passengers. > >> > >> quasi > >> > >Yep, and they found them all, therefore, there were none for the dogs to > >find. > > You pretty much made that up. > > They found nothing -- no bodies, no body parts, no blood, no bones, no > luggage, no rings (do gold rings melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no > jewelry (do diamonds melt at jet fuel temperatures?), no plane seats, > no silverware (ok, maybe they only had plastic). In other words, an > immediate mystery to the firefighters was the lack of any indication > that the plane had passengers. Even if you believe that most of the > passengers were essentially incinerated, it's not believable that all > of them were. Some of the bodies should have been recoverable right at > the scene.
If none of the passenger's remains were ever found, why all the fuss last year when they found more. IOW, you're a liar. > > Weeks later, parts of the wreckage were supposedly "analyzed" at a > government lab, and the official report claims they were able to > isolate DNA for many of the passengers. It doesn't ring true. > ...and a fool. -- Keith -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
