On May 3, 12:18 am, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 2, 10:14 pm, malibu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and > > > watching its' structure deform is too rational. > > > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who > > said they were going to 'pull it'. > > ...maybe if you read the context, it would make a little more rational > sense. Fucking nutter. > > > And the only reason he took out huge amounts > > of extra insurance on the buildings two months > > before this happened was because of global > > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat > > will bring down steel buildings. > > A little heat and major structural damage. > > > > > John
Gee, I'll bet all those explosions in the subfloors of WTC1 + WTC2 did some structural damage also! Come to think of it. When the firefighters got there, all the glass on the street floors was blown out. Shock wave from the plane hitting 80 floors up? Janitors and such coming up from the basement levels bleeding and dazed. Jet fuel trickling down the elevator shafts being ignited by someone's roach? And exploding? Severing the three-foot thick steel columns? All 5 dozen of them? (That's mighty fine primo, pardner!) Your brain got structural damage? Dropped on your head as a kid? Don't put that fire iron too close to the flames, honey. It'll melt and deform! John -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
