On 28 abr, 14:15, Eric Gisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 24, 6:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Cal Tech is the ELITE of ELITE in physics. > > "INN World Report interviewed Dr. Crockett Grabbe - professor of > physics at the University of Iowa - regarding his thoughts on the > 'collapses' of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. In this interview he lists numerous > reasons to suspect controlled demolition and expresses support for > alternative theories." > > A common mistake - I frequently confuse CalTech and U of Iowa. > > http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&client=firefox-a... > > That's interesting, no publications on any engineering topic.
None the less a phyics professor and able to write academic thesis as proven in his physics publications: http://www.physics.uiowa.edu/~cgrabbe/writing/research.html Further from your insult, NIST refuse to give out any of the critical specifications; such as blueprints and Protec photograph and video of the debris field. So even if he was Professor of Engineering he would not be able to comment as a Professional Engineer becuase he wouldn't have access to the necessary information. Yes thats right, Guliani order the expediant clean up of WTC7 and none of the assigned forensic engineers even got to analyse the debris as per normal due process. Don't believe me? Why don't you see the forensic engineers themselves testify in this History Channel piece on WTC7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVSxeJH_RCY > A > professor of physics, not engineering, who claims that explosives were > planted in not only WTC7, but WTC 1 and 2 which were trigged by the > planes impacting the building. > > Why is anyone listening to this loon? > > > > > If Feynman were alive, he would point his finger straight at the 911 > > criminal operators, the yank bastards themselves ....... > > I don't recall Feynman ever advocating nutcase positions. > > > > >http://www.911blogger.com/node/8101 > > > No self-respecting scientist should keep his mouth shut. Its a > > fundamental challenge to the method of science, a detective work most > > demanding of INTELLECTUAL HONESTY. > > I love how folks like you ask for intellectual honesty when every > effort is made to ignore evidence that doesn't agree with your > presupposed findings. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
