Christophe wrote: >>>> commercial deployment is expensive; free deployment must be GPL; >>> >>> Opinions differ on the first one of these. >> even if you define "expensive" as "costs more money than the others" ? > > Even if you consider that the huge time saving you get out of using Qt > is worth more than what you pay to acquire a licence?
then it sounds like a combination between "it's a silver bullet!" and "commercial software is better than free software!". no matter how good Qt is, the reality is that if you spend that much time on the UI implementation parts of your project, you're probably developing at the wrong abstraction level -- no matter what toolkit you're using. and if you're doing UI development the wrong way, chances are that you're doing other things the wrong way too. </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
