Fredrik Lundh wrote: > Christophe wrote: > > Even if you consider that the huge time saving you get out of using Qt > > is worth more than what you pay to acquire a licence? > > then it sounds like a combination between "it's a silver bullet!" and > "commercial software is better than free software!".
Well, nobody's stopping you from paying the commercial license fee (to get access to support services) and releasing software under the GPL. > no matter how good Qt is, the reality is that if you spend that much > time on the UI implementation parts of your project, you're probably > developing at the wrong abstraction level -- no matter what toolkit > you're using. and if you're doing UI development the wrong way, chances > are that you're doing other things the wrong way too. You're forgetting that Qt isn't just a widget toolkit. David -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
