On 10/24/06, Kevin Walzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wxPython: > Pro: Popular, actively developed, wraps native widgets, looks great on > Windows, commercial-friendly license > Con: Based on C++ toolkit; docs assume knowledge of C++; some think > coding style is too much like C++; complex to build and deploy on Linux > (wraps Gtk)
I agree with this assessment. I hated writing the code in wxPython, since it was very ugly, with tons of getters/setters lots of constants and ids WRITTEN_IN_ALL_CAPS. Yuck. That's why I think you and others are doing a grave disservice by ignoring Dabo. With Dabo, you get the best-looking toolkit across platforms (wxPython), but a clean, Pythonic API with none of the C++ crud. I've been a dozen times more productive since I switched to doing my UI code in dabo.ui, and even better, I don't have to constantly look up the names of the appropriate constants, etc. - the API is that much more consistent. -- # p.d. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
