Fredrik Lundh wrote: > "Edward Diener No Spam" wrote: > > >>>if you want better support for more precise hooking, post some examples. >> >>I want a design-time environment to hook up my objects in a visual way. >>I think it is easier than doing it manually, even in Python. > > > what objects? what hooks? visually, in what way? > > >>>>All you are saying is that you don't have a need for this, but perhaps >>>>others do. >>> >>>handwavy references to what "other may need" is another thing you should >>>avoid if you want your Python change proposal to be successful. >> >>I did not say what "others may need". > > > I'm not sure I see the big difference between "perhaps others do [have a > need]" > and "others may need", but that's me. > He's wriggling anyway, as his opening post said (among other things) "I believe that Python should have a common components model for all RAD development environments ...". So unless he's the only person who's going to use these development environments it does indeed sound a little prescriptive.
regards Steve -- Steve Holden +44 150 684 7255 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://holdenweb.blogspot.com Recent Ramblings http://del.icio.us/steve.holden -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
