On 2004-12-21, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fredrik Lundh wrote: > >> (the site is pointing to a new project, Pycs, whose site is pointing to a new >> project, Spry, "the first dynamic language to have all the best capabilities >> of >> Python, Prothon, and C# (actually C-Omega) in one language", on which >> "work has rarely begun") > > How bizarre is it that they're trying to "sell" Spry by indicating it > uses the "very best" features of Prothon, given that Prothon was a > failed project?
That seems to imply that you think market sucess == technical merits. Unless you mean that Prothon was a technical failure rather than a market-share failure... -- Grant Edwards grante Yow! Mr and Mrs PED, can at I borrow 26.7 visi.com -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list