"Luis M. Gonzalez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Terry Reedy wrote: In response to a claim (I presume by LG and snipped by LG) that Boo is as related to Python as PyPy or Stackless, I wrote. >> but I think this is silly. The 'this' that I referred to as silly was the equality part of the claim, not that that Boo has *some* relation to Python. I tried to explain by continuing ... >> PyPy is an alternate implementation of Python, >> not a different language. Stackless is a compiled extension, like many >> others, that works with the standard implementation or maybe still a >> minor modification thereof. > you're right, but what when I say "python related", I mean that it has > something or a lot in common with python, I did not and do not dispute that Boo has some (lesser) degree of relatedness. I continued by suggesting that it was about the same as for Prothon. That there are differences in degree of relatedness was my point. Nor did I or would I claim that the lesser degree of either is so low that neither should ever mentioned here. Terry J. Reedy -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
