Grant Edwards wrote:
That seems to imply that you think market sucess == technical merits. Unless you mean that Prothon was a technical failure rather than a market-share failure...
Since it was clearly both, I'm not sure why you're making this false dichotomy.
Trying to sell Spry, Pycs, or whatever its name is this week as being inspired by Prothon, a project that failed in every possible way there it to fail, doesn't impress anybody -- technically, marketing-wise, or any other criteria.
-- Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/ San Jose, CA, USA && 37 20 N 121 53 W && AIM erikmaxfrancis I have not yet begun to right! -- John Paul Jones -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
