Le ven. 8 mars 2019 à 10:44, Michael Felt <aixto...@felt.demon.nl> a écrit : > I am fine with running only on the master branch - as I long gave up the > fight for back-porting. Hard enough to get people to look at master > (emote: speaking - so also see a smile). For 2.7 the view has been, for > as long as I have been trying, that all my fixes were "new features" so > they were refused. Or some variation of that.
Right, we rarely backport changes to support a new platform in stable branch. Example of exception: we backported changes to support OpenSSL 1.1.x, but it's not exactly a "platform" :-) > As to supporting AIX - I obviously, cannot promise 24x7 support - only > best effort for as long as I am able. My goal as a packager is that it > be transparent and what can be installed can be uninstalled. And, imho, > stable Python is in the interest of AIX customers. They are the people I > try to cater to. Nobody is available 24x7 :-) Don't worry, we will bug you as soon as it turns red again by email and you can reply whenever you want or ignore such bug :-) > And, in that line - if possible, you may add my email address to the > mails the AIX bots send. We don't have such granularity yet. Again, we will simply notify you explicitly, ex: on bug reports. > Side-question: when do the build-times and success-rate start getting > scored. The PPC64 bot is "stable" in that it does not fail everything. > And if you could accept the change to setup.py to not always give the > preference to ncurses (which is onloy available via third party on AIX) > I hope it would go to full "PASS" status. I don't understand which change you are proposing. Maybe open a bug report. Victor -- Night gathers, and now my watch begins. It shall not end until my death. _______________________________________________ Python-Buildbots mailing list Python-Buildbots@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots
