On Aug 11, 5:23 am, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:48 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I picked uwsgi b/c it seemed like potentially less overhead coupled > > with nginx, rather than nginx > apache mod_wsgi. My reasoning was > > that the newer stable versions of nginx comes with uwsgi integration > > by default, you just need to install uwsgi to get started. > > > I've not using supervisor but it's super easy to start the uwsgi > > daemon: > > uwsgi --uid www-data --paste config:/location/to/your/production.ini -- > > socket :8080 -d /var/log/uwsgi.log > > So you have a separate uwsgi daemon for each application,
Which you can also do with Apache/mod_wsgi. Graham > rather than > one for all the applications? In that case, the uwsgi command line > itself could run under Supervisor. > > -- > Mike Orr <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
