On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Graham Dumpleton <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Aug 11, 5:23 am, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:48 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I picked uwsgi b/c it seemed like potentially less overhead coupled >> > with nginx, rather than nginx > apache mod_wsgi. My reasoning was >> > that the newer stable versions of nginx comes with uwsgi integration >> > by default, you just need to install uwsgi to get started. >> >> > I've not using supervisor but it's super easy to start the uwsgi >> > daemon: >> > uwsgi --uid www-data --paste config:/location/to/your/production.ini -- >> > socket :8080 -d /var/log/uwsgi.log >> >> So you have a separate uwsgi daemon for each application, > > Which you can also do with Apache/mod_wsgi.
I have used mod_wsgi with Apache a lot and I like it. On the other hand, nginx is a pretty cool web server. Any thought to combining efforts on making a unified module, that shares some of the same code, for both platforms? I could see situations where I would want to use Apache and other situations where I would want nginx. I think they are both good to have around. > > Graham > >> rather than >> one for all the applications? In that case, the uwsgi command line >> itself could run under Supervisor. >> >> -- >> Mike Orr <[email protected]> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "pylons-discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en. > > -- Thanks, Noah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
