holy crap that sounds awesome.
On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:42:24 PM UTC-4, Michael Merickel wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Vanasco > <jona...@findmeon.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > This is purely my very opinionated 2¢ ... > > > > I've had to integrate against oAuth a few times, and have constantly > found > > it a hassle. > > > > The existing 'core' Python libraries for it are rather scattered in > terms of > > active development, maturity and "street cred" ( by which I mean that > > you'll often find a big name website saying "You should use this library > for > > oAuth against our API!", yet that library is badly documented, barely > > functional, often really out of date with current specs , and ships with > a > > bunch of its own tests which it won't even pass ). > > I believe this is the purpose of oauthlib. I'd love to see a reference > implementation in pyramid. > > https://github.com/idan/oauthlib > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/pylons-devel/-/Q4E1W6dx7qkJ. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
