On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Vanasco <jonat...@findmeon.com> wrote: > This is purely my very opinionated 2¢ ... > > I've had to integrate against oAuth a few times, and have constantly found > it a hassle. > > The existing 'core' Python libraries for it are rather scattered in terms of > active development, maturity and "street cred" ( by which I mean that > you'll often find a big name website saying "You should use this library for > oAuth against our API!", yet that library is badly documented, barely > functional, often really out of date with current specs , and ships with a > bunch of its own tests which it won't even pass ).
I believe this is the purpose of oauthlib. I'd love to see a reference implementation in pyramid. https://github.com/idan/oauthlib -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pylons-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-devel?hl=en.
