----- "Al @ Lab42" <lab42...@gmail.com> a écrit : | > I think the modules should be written so that they assume they are | > named after what they are in forge. | | I don't think this is a good idea, if I've understood it fully. | | IHMO, modules in the forge should be, in the long term, interoperable | and possible interchangeable. | | I should "include apache" in my nodes, as always, whatever the apache | module is, and I think it's really a bad thing to be have something | like "include example42-apache" and then be forced to change that on | all my nodes (and all the references/requires to it) when I want to | switch to the apache module of someone else. | | But most of all, I agree with what David says about autoloading. | I find absurd the idea of having classes called with the name of the | author and not the sole name of the application.
+1, definitely Nico. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
