On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Marc Fournier <marc.fourn...@camptocamp.com> wrote: > Hello, > >> My question is this. Are the modules intended to be used with the >> author-modulename naming convention? If so, did I do something wrong >> or is there something wrong with the camptocamp-apt module that is not >> allowing this? > > This module was indeed made to be used as "apt" not "camptocamp-apt". > You raise an interesting question, which I'm not sure of the answer... > > Should module authors modify their modules to match the forge > namespace ? Or is it expected that users rename modules downloaded from > the forge before using them ? > > Does anyone have an idea of right the way to do this ? > > Marc
The intent is to have the modules downloaded from the module tool, as with RPM, though obviously if you grab them via the download button they can be named whatever they like. I think the modules should be written so that they assume they are named after what they are in forge. (It seems we should be making a better note of that in the instructions for the module tool.) --Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
