Le lundi 07 juin 2010 à 09:18 +0200, Marc Fournier a écrit : > Hello, > > > My question is this. Are the modules intended to be used with the > > author-modulename naming convention? If so, did I do something wrong > > or is there something wrong with the camptocamp-apt module that is not > > allowing this? > > This module was indeed made to be used as "apt" not "camptocamp-apt". > You raise an interesting question, which I'm not sure of the answer... > > Should module authors modify their modules to match the forge > namespace ? Or is it expected that users rename modules downloaded from > the forge before using them ? > > Does anyone have an idea of right the way to do this ?
I'd personnaly suggests to continue working this way, because then : - you have to read (and understand) the module before using it - you can easily compare modules - you don't want to overwrite an existing module - nor mess up your module dir - mv is not so difficult to use :) Regards, Nico.
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
