On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Charles Johnson <gm.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Nigel Kersten <nig...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Which examples?
>> I've always qualified the full class name, in 0.24 and 0.25. I didn't
>> realize you could do what you've done above.
>>
>> It seems undesirable, ie:
>>
>> class foo {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> class eggs {
>> include foo
>> }
>>
>> class eggs::foo {
>> ...
>> }
>>
> Thank you, Nigel, for your patience!
> I can try changing that, but it still does not explain why all the other
> modules --there are dozens-- most of which are quite simple and do not have
> this involved syntax are not run on the client.
> There is something very simple, like a missing path or some such. I have run
> puppetmasterd --debug --no-daemon and on the client puppetd --debug --test
> I would be willing to post output if it might help.
Not that I'm volunteering right now as I have a bunch of reports to
write :) but this sounds like IRC might be a better vehicle for
debugging? There are usually a couple of people around with some spare
cycles to help.
#puppet on freenode.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
