On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 08:18 +1000, James Turnbull wrote: > Brice Figureau wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. > >>> Can't do it at > >>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the > >>> system for this, because > >>> I'd like it as well... > >> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a > >> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and > >> require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug > >> report. > > > > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > > I think I'll have to resubmit it. > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1.
Yes, that's what my patch was doing. I'll resurrect the patch and post it to puppet-dev this week-end. -- Brice Figureau My Blog: http://www.masterzen.fr/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
