James Turnbull schrieb: > Brice Figureau wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0200, Peter Meier wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> >>>> Only way I know is to make individual objects depend on other objects. >>>> Can't do it at >>>> class level... I think there is a feature request somewhere in the >>>> system for this, because >>>> I'd like it as well... >>>> >>> hmm did I only dream that in the upcoming release there will be a >>> require (or something like that) keyword to include a class and >>> require it. Unfortunately I'm not able to find the appropriate bug >>> report. >>> >> I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: >> http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 >> >> Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. >> I think I'll have to resubmit it. >> > > Yes - had to go re-read myself. As long as we provide both functions - > include and a stronger require - I think this is an easy +1. > > Regards > > James Turnbull > > Yes, that will be great when require for classes comes in. With this I can much more control, how puppet evaluates the configuration.
Thanks! Philipp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
