Hi > I implemented it for sure, but in the end I think it was rejected: > http://projects.reductivelabs.com/issues/1907 > > Re-reading the thread I see why we rejected the bug, but not the patch. > I think I'll have to resubmit it.
yeah I objected because of changing the behaviour of include. But I thought that it was implemented with a different keyword, which wouldn't change the behaviour of include. Something like a "stronger" include and I thought it have been called required. But maybe I'm wrong. cheers pete --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
