On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 08:03 -0400, Bryan Kearney wrote: > Karl Bowden wrote: > > Ok I've got it sorted now and I'll submit the recipe to the wiki after > > somebody here reviews it as I'm only new to puppet. > > > > After writing tests in ruby with the libaugeas-ruby bindings it turns > > out the problem is that the bindings do not like set values to be > > quoted. > > > > Works: > > set \"/dir[.='<%= name %>']\" <%= name %> > > > > Does not work: > > set \"/dir[.='<%= name %>']\" '<%= name %>' > > Are these commands in augtool or commands in puppet? I want to see if > the puppet type is causing issues not in augtool.
I _think_ there's an issue with how the augeas type is parsing commands from the changes property (see ticket #2141) To fix that, the mini-language for the changes property needs to be backed by a slightly more robust 'parser'; I think it should be told explicitly the arguments that commands take, and scan them slightly differently for paths and for strings. I attached a little standalone program that does the scanning right (I'll also attach that to ticket #2141) David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
