On Sep 4, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm. Maybe the list of options above is incomplete, but I read the IRC > thread differently. > > I read it as: > > If class is not included and not contained and doesn't require parameters, > contain and include > If included and not contained and doesn't require parameters, contain > If contained, fail > If requires parameters, fail > > So basically, contain does an include as long as the class doesn't require > parameters, but fails if it does. > > That's exactly what I (and I thought others) recommended, but I thought there > was disagreement about. This is right and my conclusion was wrong. --eric0 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
