Hmm. A null byte. I will take a look at related code later today to see if
I can figure it out. It hasn't appeared for me (on GNU/Linux).

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 7:23 AM Alan Mead <ame...@alanmead.org> wrote:

> Yes, if i blow up the screenshot, I think I see four zeros. I don't know
> of any way to copy that character or zoom the interface.
>
>
>
> -Alan
>
>
> On 3/6/2021 11:14 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> I cannot quite read the digits in those boxes. Are they 0000?
>
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021, 8:45 PM Alan Mead <ame...@alanmead.org> wrote:
>
>> Also, FWIW, the Windows output contains a strange character (vertical
>> tab?):
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/6/2021 7:36 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>> How very odd!
>>
>> I do use the interactive mode occasionally, for testing.
>>
>> There are two different ways that interactive mode can work: with the
>> "readline" library for command editing, or without it.  I tried both
>> of these and couldn't reproduce it on GNU/Linux.
>>
>> More and more, we need a Windows developer, if Windows is going to be
>> supported well.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 5:22 PM Alan Mead <am...@alanmead.org> 
>> <am...@alanmead.org> wrote:
>>
>> If I've ever used the interactive mode of PSPP, I cannot recall. I think 
>> it's broken (at least in windows). It reads the first character of each 
>> command as a 'p':
>>
>> G:\projects\pspp>"C:\Program Files (x86)\PSPP\bin\pspp.exe"
>> PSPP is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it
>> under certain conditions; type "show copying." to see the conditions.
>> There is ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY for PSPP; type "show warranty." for details.
>> GNU pspp 1.4.0-gc3c044
>> PSPP> exit
>> pxit
>> error: Unknown command `pxit'.
>> PSPP>
>>
>> PSPP> exit
>> pxit
>>
>> error: Unknown command `pxit'.
>> PSPP>
>> ^C
>> G:\projects\pspp>"C:\Program Files (x86)\PSPP\bin\pspp.exe"
>> PSPP is free software and you are welcome to distribute copies of it
>> under certain conditions; type "show copying." to see the conditions.
>> There is ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY for PSPP; type "show warranty." for details.
>> GNU pspp 1.4.0-gc3c044
>> PSPP> show license
>> phow license
>> error: Unknown command `phow'.
>> PSPP>
>>
>> PSPP>  show license
>> pshow license
>>
>> error: Unknown command `pshow'.
>> PSPP>
>>
>> PSPP>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>
>> science + technology = better workers
>> https://talalg.com
>>
>>
>> Ginsberg's Theorem:
>>
>> 0. There is a game.
>> 1. You can't win.
>> 2. You can't break even.
>> 3. You can't even get out of the game.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
>> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>>
>> science + technology = better workers
>> http://www.alanmead.org
>>
>> The irony of this ... is that the Internet is
>> both almost-infinitely expandable, while at the
>> same time constrained within its own pre-defined
>> box. And if that makes no sense to you, just
>> reflect on the existence of Facebook. We have
>> the vastness of the internet and yet billions
>> of people decided to spend most of them time
>> within a horribly designed, fake-news emporium
>> of a website that sucks every possible piece of
>> personal information out of you so it can sell it
>> to others. And they see nothing wrong with that.
>>
>> -- Kieren McCarthy, commenting on why we are not
>>                     all using IPv6
>>
>>
> --
>
> Alan D. Mead, Ph.D.
> President, Talent Algorithms Inc.
>
> science + technology = better workers
> http://www.alanmead.org
>
> The irony of this ... is that the Internet is
> both almost-infinitely expandable, while at the
> same time constrained within its own pre-defined
> box. And if that makes no sense to you, just
> reflect on the existence of Facebook. We have
> the vastness of the internet and yet billions
> of people decided to spend most of them time
> within a horribly designed, fake-news emporium
> of a website that sucks every possible piece of
> personal information out of you so it can sell it
> to others. And they see nothing wrong with that.
>
> -- Kieren McCarthy, commenting on why we are not
>                     all using IPv6
>
>

Reply via email to