On 18/06/2010 01:22 p.m., Michael Oke, II wrote:
> First of all, she isn't "half his size" at all.  She is every bit as big
> as he is and he, a lone officer may well have felt threatened.

LOL

>    Just why
> was it that they felt that they didn't have to obey his request?  Are
> they permitted to do as they wish with no regard for the law?

Of course they are! And then a *judge* has to look at what happens and 
apply the law. A cop is not entitled to "punish" anyone, breaking the 
law or not.
FYI, did you know the law does not prohibit anything? It just states 
what are the penalties. It is not forbidden to kill a person. It's just 
that if you get caught you get so many years in prison.

>    Had they
> done as requested, they may well have walked away with nothing more than
> a warning or, at worst, a ticket.  Heck, the reporter even relayed that
> the chief stated that a punch was an acceptable technique to use and
> escalation of force was a judgment call for the officer or officers
> involved in an altercation.
>    

Of course. Verra masculine thing to do too.

> As for chivalry, nothing that I saw in that video suggested that either
> of those women deserved any such treatment.
>
>    

It is not that the women deserve the treatment. If you were a gentleman 
you'd know you treat women as ladies not because they may deserve it or 
not, but because *you* deserve it. But I see there is no point 
explaining the finer details when I plainly see you don't even get the 
spirit of it.



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to