How much work is it to upgrade your product for him? Is the code already written? If you don't have to do any additional coding, I would say take the money and run. It's better to take $1500.00 than 0.00. If you have to make mods, depending on how much work it would take, I'd say go for a higher fee. It sounds like he is over a barrel on the OS upgrade, so you appear to have some leverage, but the difference is negligible. We had written an application for a local police dept and they stopped paying the annual maintenance, but all of the sudden they have a need. We took the high road, and instead of charging them for previous years (2) sans maintenance, we just told them to pay for this years, and that runs out in July. I think it's better to relax the rules in order to keep everyone happy, and with the economy being in the toilet, I think you have to have some give and take.
John Harvey > I offer to support my app he's had since 2005 (and not paid > anything yet > received upgrades for free in past 3 years). There was no extended > support contract. I had an initial contract to provide > software and did > so. I'm now trying to get clients to sign on for annual > support so my > work is compensated (rather than just for the good of the > software and > cause anymore). I offer to client for $2000. He says no way > more than > $1500. I had thought $3000 was fair and felt I was giving > him a great > deal at $2000. His investment in it is about $15k-20k? since 2005. > Last payment made on contract back in 2007. Well, as the > story goes, he > now tries to get my app to work on his Windows 7 box and can't get it > running. I'm pretty confident I could get it running for > him, but don't > really want to do the "ala carte" support fee so as to open doors to > other clients who want the ala carte option as well. Now he > emails me > with the following: > > "We are having a challenging year as everyone seems to be having. > Looking to help you out, but I also need help. Need to know > if you can > get the program to work on latest window version? What can > you offer? > Let me know what your thought are." > > His remarks of the past were that he'd gladly test my software for me > and provide feedback and insight "in order to help make it more > marketable for MBSS." I basically told him that I had another > individual that was going to be my tester and although I > gladly welcomed > his testing and feedback so that the app was better for him and other > customers in the long run, he'd have to pay for support. (No > more "why > pay for the cow when you can get the milk for free" going on here.) > > The software really hasn't done anything and nor do I expect it to > without me putting a much more significant time (& more -- like > advertising/marketing/sales) investment in it. I've put > significant $$$ > into it already and am not willing to work on it for free any more. > Time to better manage my time, or at least enjoy life a bit more. > > My initial thought is to simply say: "Sure, I can get it > working on the > latest Windows version. Just renew at the $2000/annually and > you'll get > 24 hours of support for the year, and whatever hours aren't spent in > support, I'll gladly credit towards any future development work you'd > like done." > > Girlfriend advises me to just let him hear static for a few > days. I'm > usually on top of this stuff and don't keep people waiting. > What do you > think? What would you do? > > TIA! > > > -- > Mike Babcock, MCP [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/00ea01cabe27$de327090$9a9751...@[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
