> Bob Calco wrote: > >> I can't believe that our society has degenerated to a point where we > >> consider same-sex marriage acceptable. It won't be long before > >> euthanasia, child pornography, and bestiality will be the next > Liberal > >> sacrament. > >> > >> > Well, Catholics already eat flesh and blood, that is canibalism, > so...... anything goes.
Yawn. > Good! Sod'em! > Why stop at 90%? Why not 900%? Let's rape, pillage and murder everyone! > I fear to ask what is "monopoly" money. Money is money, and whoever > gives money expects something in return. I'd be really pissed if my > govt. gave money and didn't ask for control, partnership, interest, or > the three of them. Anyway the other part is free to not accept said > money. That, my dear commie friend, is capitalism. > The more technical term is "fiat" money, that is, money out of thin air, money that doesn't actually exist, so isn't even worth what toilet paper is worth. We just wrote ourselves a $1.2 trillion IOU (since the ChiComs demurred) and it didn't even make the news cycle since everyone was busy competing over who could scream the loudest over the non-issue of AIG bonuses. > > + The $700 billion bailout + $400 Billion omnibus budget + $2 > trillion toxic > > asset "plan" + Next year's $4 trillion budget (complete with $1.75 > trillion > > deficit) > > > All in order to save companies and employment in your country. As > opposed to ..... how many billion? For a lousy war on the other end of > the world. The Obama "stimulus" alone was more than the cost of the whole Iraq war. That was on top of TARP, which was also bigger than the Iraq war. All three combined are about what Turbo Tax Toxic Tim Geithner is going to blow on "toxic assets" (who needs bankruptcy court when Uncle Sam will take the loss?) The rest is just a mind-numbing number of zeroes in the service of Chicago-style political payback and electioneering. > > + The executive branch going for complete control of the salaries of > > employees of all companies that in some way receive federal funds; > > > Once again, the said companies can say "no thank you" and go broke. > Now, > can't they? So, what the f..ck are you complaining about? http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123879833094588163.html Quote: "I must be naive. I really thought the administration would welcome the return of bank bailout money. Some $340 million in TARP cash flowed back this week from four small banks in Louisiana, New York, Indiana and California. This isn't much when we routinely talk in trillions, but clearly that money has not been wasted or otherwise sunk down Wall Street's black hole. So why no cheering as the cash comes back? "My answer: The government wants to control the banks, just as it now controls GM and Chrysler, and will surely control the health industry in the not-too-distant future. Keeping them TARP-stuffed is the key to control. And for this intensely political president, mere influence is not enough. The White House wants to tell 'em what to do. Control. Direct. Command." > > + The President firing the CEO of one company (over any input from > its board > > members or even Congress) and telling another company which foreign > company > > it should partner with; > > > And these companies are just...wimps? I mean, why do the companies pay > heed to what the pres tells them to do? Maybe because he's putting > money > up front and they need it? Well tough! That's capitalism! Or are you in > favour of some shitty european socialism? > Ha! Lads, meet social Bob! The President has zero authority under the Constitution to assume any of the powers the companies are giving him in exchange for worthless fiat cash to save their asses, and which the Congress is just handing over to the executive branch with nary a squibble. Eventually some of this will make it to the courts. But even they don't care about the Constitution anymore. We are no longer a nation of laws but of men---or more precisely, one man. The One. Barack. Hussein. Obama. All hail. > > + President insults the Queen of England with an iPod full of his > campaign > > speeches; > > > I think the lady will let you know if she's been insulted. Till then > you > are putting your lousy hand's on other people's affairs. A very > un-gentlemanly occupation if I may say so. I was just observing what a crass narcissist he is in behavior toward our erstwhile European "allies" vs. what a subservient, apologetic scholomo he is around our enemies. > > + President bows -- literally -- to the King of Saudi Arabia, and > gets rave > > reviews from a Russian autocrat who calls him his "new Comrade", and > goes to > > Turkey to start direct talks with Syrian dictator Assad for the first > > time... > > > And dear Dick Nix talked with the Soviets "for the first time". Didn't > he? And your country has supported countless arab kings and dictators > and autocrats. So what's new? Bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia and chumming it up with terrorists like Assad, though perfectly within his psychological profile, and absolutely consistent with his convictions and what little he's actually done before adorning the office of President, is a very dangerous thing for a actual President sworn to uphold the Constitution to do. Spiritually speaking, he put the US under the controlling spirit of the god of Persia by performing this seemingly naïve political gesture. It's actually rather astounding. > > People really don't know the half of it, and even worse, they don't > realize > > just how outrageous these actions are, constitutionally speaking. > > > Pah! You sound like an agitated old lady who's seen a couple kissing in > the sidewalk and shouts that precludes the fall of civilization. What's > wrong with you Bobby? Have they changed your medication? Feeding birds > is not good enough lately? Admit it. Most of you in other countries cheer Obama precisely because you want to see the US wrecked for good. Why beat around the Bush anymore? You are getting what you asked for. Now watch what happens. :( - Bob _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
