Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Sytze de Boer <[email protected]> wrote:
>> My users must update their payroll system every year (in March) for
>> new statutory requirements.
>> They pay an annual maintenance fee for this.
>> In the past, I knew there were some free-loaders who did not pay but
>> still downloaded the update from the web site
>> Last year, I caught 8 of them because I put a simple new tool in place.
>> If anyone performed the update, it sent me an email.
>> I told the end-user I was doing so as part of the Update blurb/licence
>> agreement (which no-one reads)
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> I'd put in a security "load" of the update that demanded a key to install.
>
> You get they key when I receive your payment.
>
> Funny how people want their stuff to work all the time.


Funny too how the cheap MFs who want something for nothing don't want
you to audit their usage, either.  Still, looking at this from the other
side, we would bitch if M$ was monitoring our usage.  For me, it's a
non-issue because I'm doing nothing wrong.  But, privacy advocates would
raise hell.  I for one don't care if the cops are checking up on me or
if cameras in public places are recording everything going on out there.
  Doesn't bother me in the slighest because it's not interfering with my
life.  However, several others would be totally against such thing
(...and this has played out already in the political/country theater).




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to