On Dec 28, 2007, at 1:38 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
wrote:
>> If it cannot be explained by science, then it should not be taught
>> as science.
>>
>> Why is this so hard to understand?
>
> Who's having a hard time with that?
It sure seemed that you were. You sort of agreed with the notion of
keeping science and religion distinct, but had to qualify it,
suggesting that things that cannot be explained by science should be
included as scientific teaching.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
