Ed Leafe wrote: > It sure seemed that you were. You sort of agreed with the notion of > keeping science and religion distinct, but had to qualify it, > suggesting that things that cannot be explained by science should be > included as scientific teaching.
Um, no.....your inference is incorrect. Don't infer anything from me as for whatever reason with some people, it seems to come across wrong from the way I intended it. Just a reminder of why I should ignore these OT posts, as I'm misunderstood a lot!! _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
