You should have a project in the same way you have a VFP project with screens programs reports etc. I have a copy of FOXPROX.EXE and mine won't build an EXE but will build an APP. Think you needed something called a distribution kit but it's been a while. If you are only building an app you would need to run it from foxprox.exe or maybe some kind of runtime exe. What do they run now, EXE or APP?

Do you have the project file and all the other bits?

HTH

* Peter Cushing *
IT development and support

Signature


Kevin Cully wrote:
I have a new client that has a Foxpro 2.0 for DOS app that they've been running for decades. They've had some fits and starts on upgrading it to Visual Foxpro. I hope I'll be able to finish the upgrade.

They have one small adjustment they want to their existing app. Basically they want to look up a now 6 digit item number where the picture of the @SAY only allows for 5. Simple fix that I've made to the PRG. I've come to believe that this PRG (and others) are compiled into an APP file. Let us call it THEAPP.APP.

I don't think I have a full copy of Foxpro for DOS anymore. I have a program called FoxproX.exe but I don't think I have the other supporting files.

My Questions:
1. How do I build an APP in FPD? I think I need a BUILD.exe file but I may be wrong.
2. Is there a project type file that tells it what to include in the APP?

This knowledge has been jettisoned from my brain. Many thanks.




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to