I moved everything to VFP 9 not long after SP1, and have never found a problem, except for having to fix up a few SQL statements.
Frankly, I don't understand why some folks are still using VFP 6 and 7. VFP 9 is simply better and doesn't have any significant problems. I did NOT go to SP2 because of the number of separate pieces you need to make it work, and I didn't need the Report extensions. Dan Covill ---- Desmond Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote: > Know everyone is going to think I am nuts.... however. > > Got this old legacy VFP6 application, my description, it is a hodge-podge > of old 2.6 code, VFP6 forms and reports. All modifications etc. are made > using VFP6. > > Was working on a form today and needed a temp table, the old select > whatever from whatever into cursor whatever readwrite would not work. For > grins I took an original VFP6 form and modified under VFP9, including a > select * from into cursor whatever readwrite saved under a different name > and called it from the program and the form runs! > > Not exactly sure what I have gained with the exception of readwrite... > > Would be interested in any opinions/thoughts..... > > Regards, > Desmond > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/20140124172746.P7NII.104799.root@cdptpa-web36-z01 ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
